Tank
Combat in Spain
By
Anthony J. Candil
Casemate
publishers
ISBN
078-1-61200-970-4
Hardback,
240 pages
Now
I bought this book with an open mind, looking to learn something new about this
aspect of the Spanish Civil War. I knew from my earlier reading about the
general lack of tanks during the war and also that tank use by both sides was
really quite limited.
For
all the much vaulted propaganda Germany actually only supplied 122 Panzer Is
and Italy provided 155 of their L3 CV-33/35 tankettes during the whole
conflict. The Soviets provided the Republic with 281 of the far superior T-26B
and 50 more BT-5s. These numbers alone mean that tanks could not have played
any significant role during the war.
The
author agrees with my thoughts on this but then gets bogged down with technical
theory about how the Republic failed to utilize their advantage (having better
equipment), by using the T-26s in ways which had not at the time been tested or
proven. And even though he talks about armoured cars and their use in passing,
I think if he had broadened his view point to cover all aspects of armoured
warfare during the conflict, this would have made the book more interesting.
Whilst
freely quoting Fuller and Liddell Hart on their writing about mechanization and
combined tactics; the author only in passing grudgingly admits few if anyone of
the time was taking these views seriously, so why would the Spanish?
Col.
von Thoma of the Condor Legion, tried to convince Franco to use tanks en-masse,
but this was generally ignored as local priorities took precedence. The Italian
CTV did for the most part keep their armour together, but until the final
pursuit phase of the war, the L3 proved far too vulnerable and no match for the
Republic`s Soviet tanks. Effectively both sides used tanks as infantry support
weapons, with little or no cooperation between infantry and tanks.
The
author goes into fair detail over shipments and numbers for both sides, how
they organised training and supply, even going as far as naming key officers.
This is only useful if you are deeply interested in such periphery detail.
The
author does explain how the Soviets limited those who Spaniards put forward to
operate their tanks to committed Communists thereby limiting the pool of
applicants. He also explains how a distinct lack of training led to poor
performance and lack of maintenance which of course led to breakdowns and
losses.
The
Rebels (I refuse to call them Nationalists) quickly found their tanks, both the
Panzer Is and L3s were no match for the Soviet T-26 which could engage them
with its 45mm gun well outside the effective range of their machine guns.
However the Republican tanks often became isolated from their infantry and
advanced into villages or built up areas without support where they could be
attacked by enemy infantry using petrol bombs and hand grenades! The Rebels
also quickly adapted to the threat by having anti-tank guns close to the action
to combat enemy tanks.
At
the end of the day the author correctly points of weaknesses in the Republic`s
military strategy as the cause of its downfall; the small number of tanks made
little significant difference to the end result. I have always maintained the
oil provided on credit to the Rebels by American companies and the huge
quantity of trucks supplied by Ford, GM, etc had a much greater effect towards
Franco`s victory than the direct aid provided by both Germany and Italy.
If
you know the general history of the SCW and are a wargamer interesting in
recreating battles on a tabletop, I`m not sure this book will be for you. Not
enough combat details – there weren`t many actual tank Vs tank actions and the
author quickly becomes rather preachy with his hindsight viewpoint. I should
also add, I`ve read a few of these “dissertation” type articles which are then
expanded into a book, so should have known better. This covers a very small
part of the SCW and eventually the author is just trying to pad it out, he
repeats himself or repeats quotes he`s already made – just does get a bit
irritating towards the end.
I know what you mean about expanded dissertation books. I once saw a book on an obscure medieval battle in Yorkshire. When I picked it up I saw that the typeface was larger than normal and it only ran to about 160 pages. The first sentence began 'When the Romans first arrived on these shores' at which point I put the book down and left the building.
ReplyDeleteBy the end he was really struggling to stretch it out repeating himself and quotes he`d already used.
DeleteThank you for the concise review. Always good to hear about a book on the SCW. CarlL
ReplyDeleteI honestly bought it with an open mind - ah well
DeleteThanks for the review. I agree that the actual use of armour in the SCW left much to be desired but, to give them the benefit of the doubt, I don’t suppose there was much experience of armoured combat at that time. Perhaps we are guilty of hindsight…
ReplyDeleteHave a merry Christmas and a happy New Year. Cheers,
Geoff
I totally agree, but it seems at times the author missed this point - Feliz Navidad my friend :)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the Review. World be interesting to know more about the oil and truck deliveries. Regards, Pat
ReplyDeleteRight at the start of the war Amerco diverted several tankers (already at sea) already paid for by the Republic to Nationalist controlled ports. And from then on gave the Nationalists credit to buy more (this credit backed by British, US and Swiss bankers). The truck supplied by Ford, Chevrolt & Studbaker were also all supplied on credit. Ford bragged that he and the owners of Amerco were responsible for the nationalist victory. Nationalist writers seem to be 100% in agreement as without US oil Franco`s forces couldn`t move.
DeleteThanks for the review. I am working on a piece about the Republican attack on Fuentes de Ebro. Wondering if the books mentions the action? Chris B.
ReplyDeleteThe book is very sparse on actual coba narratives, the author seems to have been less interested in actual first hand accounts and more on broadstroke, strategic use of armour during the conflict.
Delete